Engage

Approvals

Nothing publishes until a human approves it — one tap approves, one tap rejects.

Awaiting review

2

Approved this cycle

3

Rejected

1

SocialThree-post series: what surgeons asked us at NASS

LinkedIn carousel built from the top questions collected at the booth.

Content Engine · LinkedIn followers · 895 words · updated 1 day ago

LinkedIn carousel built from the top questions collected at the booth. ## Where this came from Drafted by the content engine from the GS Medical knowledge base — brand voice guide, published case series, and the last ninety days of field notes. Every claim below traces back to a linked source. ## The argument Surgeons do not adopt a device because of a brochure. They adopt it because someone they trust walked them through the failure modes honestly, and the numbers held up under questioning. So this piece leads with the failure mode, shows the data, and only then explains what we changed. ## What we are asking for One clear next step: the technique guide, a lab seat, or twenty minutes with a surgeon consultant. Nothing else.

Brand Voice Guide v4Harborview 218-case seriesField notes — Q2 territory reviews
Open in editor
BlogWhy cage subsidence is still a fixation problem, not a material problem

A field-level look at endplate preparation, footprint selection, and what the last decade of subsidence literature actually supports.

Content Engine · Spine surgeons, fellows · 838 words · updated 4 days ago

A field-level look at endplate preparation, footprint selection, and what the last decade of subsidence literature actually supports. ## Where this came from Drafted by the content engine from the GS Medical knowledge base — brand voice guide, published case series, and the last ninety days of field notes. Every claim below traces back to a linked source. ## The argument Surgeons do not adopt a device because of a brochure. They adopt it because someone they trust walked them through the failure modes honestly, and the numbers held up under questioning. So this piece leads with the failure mode, shows the data, and only then explains what we changed. ## What we are asking for One clear next step: the technique guide, a lab seat, or twenty minutes with a surgeon consultant. Nothing else.

Brand Voice Guide v4Harborview 218-case seriesField notes — Q2 territory reviews
Open in editor

Recently decided

The latest approval outcomes

TitleStatusReviewerReview noteDecided
Spine Signal — July: deformity planning and the pedicle screw debatepublishedNora IbrahimAug 2, 2026
What a value analysis committee actually reads in your submissionrejectedClaire LindqvistToo close to a competitive claim we cannot substantiate. Rewrite around our own registry data.Aug 1, 2026
Spine Signal — August: ASC economics, robotics, and three case reviewsapprovedTomas DuarteAug 1, 2026
Cadaver lab seats — Boston, September 18publishedClaire LindqvistJul 31, 2026